The tank was adopted in 1973 and still has the potential for. The oldest tank in service is the T-72BM ‘Ural’. I just think that early tanks are significantly more interesting. Vadim Savicky/Defense Ministry of Russia. And that just removed the character of them. They all seems really similar and all preform well. In time, tanks, submarines, and aircraft revolutionized how World War I was.
Then in comparison I feel like most if not all modern tanks just are not as interesting. The order to release the gas was entrusted to German military meteorologists. And it's not necessarily only the strange tanks all of the ones like the sheman varients, stug, Churchill mk1-3, Tiger 1, t-34-85, Panther and such all have their certain quirks or history that make them really cool in my opinion. all of these tanks and many many more are just so wacky and strange but that makes me so interested by them. Like for example the KV-2, BT-42, mk1 landship, Saint Chamond, Strv 103, t28/t95, Strumtiger. I'd also rather have a Panzer 4 than an Abrams. I'd much rather have a 40+ year old car than a new one. Modern tanks along with modern cars, trucks, and suv's, don't really do anything for me. I just feel like early tanks have so much more character then modern tanks. I think the German World War 2 tanks were the best looking tanks ever made. There's just something about Early tanks that modern tanks cant do for me. VI Tiger tanks put out of action in North Africa was. I feel like I'm the only one on the earth that just doesn't really care for modern tanks yet has a endless love for ww1-vietnam war tanks. While the Army fought in North Africa with modern artillery pieces.
0 kommentar(er)
